[padb] Réf. : Re: Réf. : Better handling of threads in stack traces.

[thipadin.seng-long at bull.net]

On Mon,  21th dec 2009 at 13:04 +0100  ashley at pittman.co.uk  wrote:

>On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:37 +0100, thipadin.seng-long at bull.net wrote:

>> I have a support request from Bull customer that would like to have 
>> padb report sorted by threads as below: 

>That's great.

>> Would you accept it ? 

> I'm not sure what you mean here, I would gladly accept a patch
> implementing it.

> I don't have a huge amount of time to be working on padb right now and
> there are already a large number of features waiting for a release as
> well as people who've found they need to use the SVN version for some
> individual machine.

> My priority currently is to finish off what is absent, package padb
> properly into a rpm, convert it to use antoconf and fix what bugs people
> find in the mean time.  Re: threads in stack traces I don't seem myself
> having time to do anything other than the simple option of allowing
> users to restrict which threads are shown for each invocation of padb
> without it delaying the release.

> Ashley,

Ok you are right, let's make a package padb out of all 
features waiting for a release. I think it is a wise decision.
As to me I will be off for 2 weeks, so I'll be working on threads sort 
at the beginning of the year.
Thipadin.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pittman.org.uk/pipermail/padb-devel_pittman.org.uk/attachments/20091221/f0079609/attachment.html>