[padb-users] PADB and multiple resource managers

[Daniel Kidger]

hmm

consider if you have LSF and RMS running below it. Then the parallel job
could be found from either.
Does this matter ?  hopefully not - unless going by one route has any extra
functionality compared to the other

Also is always scanning all RMs potentially slow?

Daniel


2009/6/10 Ashley Pittman <ashley at pittman.co.uk>

> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:39 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:24 +0100, Ashley Pittman wrote:
>
> > Independent ish. A job might exist in one, the other or both,
> > particularly when doing testing. Reporting on the first resource manager
> > that has any jobs probably makes sense.
>
> Can you try the following patch and let me know if it meets your needs,
> if there are multiple installed resource managers detected it'll check
> how many of them have active jobs, if only one has active jobs it'll use
> that one otherwise it'll bounce the decision back to the user.
>
> If I don't hear I'll commit this sometime tomorrow.
>
> Ashley,
>
> --
>
> Ashley Pittman, Bath, UK.
>
> Padb - A parallel job inspection tool for cluster computing
> http://padb.pittman.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> padb-users mailing list
> padb-users at pittman.org.uk
> http://pittman.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/padb-users_pittman.org.uk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pittman.org.uk/pipermail/padb-users_pittman.org.uk/attachments/20090610/84223740/attachment.html>